Sunday, June 21, 2009

TWILIGHT: Published in the Gazette June 21, 2009

When the reality program “Survivor” is in season, it’s easy finding my family every Thursday night: we are sitting directly in front of our television. This fact usually surprises people acquainted with the Millers, because we otherwise watch very little television compared to most people and consciously avoid the kind of backstabbing immorality demonstrated regularly on “Survivor.” However, I think viewing “Survivor” with my children presents a great opportunity to casually discuss bad behavior and good choices. While I don’t constantly interrupt the program to lecture my children, I do talk to them during commercial breaks and immediately following the program about contestant behavior and actions. I recognize this parenting tool isn’t for everyone, but it’s working for us.

One of my reasons for recommending Stephenie Meyer’s “Twilight” is consistent with my approach to “Survivor.” Reading the book with a young person in your care provides a fabulous opportunity to discuss risky behavior. No, I’m not suggesting you tell your daughter to stay away from pale young men who never eat hamburger; I realize there’s no such thing as vampires. Probably. Rather, I’m suggesting talking with young “Twilight” readers (I’ve seen girls as young as 11-years-old hoisting around the book) about the negatives of driving over 100 miles per hour, allowing young men to sneak into bedrooms, and being drawn to people who are dangerous in general.

Of course, there’s another reason to read “Twilight.” It’s called sheer entertainment value. While “Twilight” is certainly not the best book ever written, it keeps most readers engaged. The story follows high schooler Isabella “Bella” Swan, who moves away from sunny Arizona to the overcast Olympic Peninsula. Once there, Bella quickly finds friends among her fellow students. But one student--hunky, mysterious Edward Cullen--seems thoroughly repulsed by Bella. Eventually, Edward’s initial reaction to Bella turns into something deeper and sweeter. You guessed it, the two fall in love. And when a human and vampire fall in love, there’s going to be issues.

If you think dealing with human/vampire issues isn’t interesting to most readers, think again. There are three subsequent books in the “Twilight” series, an existing movie and more to come. Book sales alone are around 50 million copies. If one of those copies belongs to a young person in your life, I recommend you read it, too. While the premise of “Twilight” might not appeal to you, don’t worry. The book won’t bite. Probably.

7 comments:

Solvang Sherrie said...

I haven't read Twilight - vampires aren't my thing. But I read an interesting post from Sara Raasch who worried that the young girls who love the books and Edward end up with a warped sense of a good relationship.

Raasch views their relationship as abusive since Edward alienates Bella from her family, makes her change who she is, and manipulates and controls her. So I guess if/when my daughter wants to read this book, I'll have to take your approach and read it with her and point out the dangers in their relationship. Besides the biting!

Here's the link if you're interested:
http://cwim.blogspot.com/2009/04/edward-bella-abusive-relationship.html

Myra said...

I loved the series, and think it includes so many teachable moments for the mother/daughter dynamic specifically.

It's also just a lot of fun!

Paul Michael Murphy said...

Teachable moments galore! For example, as a writer, you need only describe a character's "smoldering eyes" once. We get it. Really, we do.

Kelly said...

I agree that Twilight is pure entertainment. I did enjoy the series (Eclipse was my favorite), but like Sherrie said, the Bella/Edward relationship really was on the controlling side. (I'm Team Jacob). It certainly could bring up some important parent/daughter talks.

jambuku said...

Anita - I am curious as to whether you will continue on through the whole series?

I was engaged enough to finish the first book and like you I knew before I started that I was not her intended market. One book was enough for me but I was curious about where Meyers would take the story.

If you don't want to invest the time required for the entire series but have that "need to know" for either parental reasons or completionist tendencies(as was my case)then don't forget wikipedia - your one stop shop for the extreme skim read. It was thorough enough to answer all my questions...well just the one actually (what happens?)and I don't think Meyers will be missing the royalties from my non-purchases :-)

Then again, I am unlikely to be discussing the books with younger readers any time soon. I have known book club members to bluff their way through a meeting having only read the wikipedia entry and not the book itself. Maybe it is possible.

Big Plain V said...

Wow, Anita, you handled this review with class and style. I'd have used trashy four letter words.

Out of the three of us, you are the better writer. (Get it?)

Anita said...

SHERRIE: It's just like the women readers who are attracted to Janet Evanovich's character, Ranger...but women have some experience, right?

MYRA: So true!

PMM: A writer's workshop could be taught from the flaws in this book (I do think the end gets
better, though).

KELLY: How funny! My daughter kept complaining, "I don't care what Jacob thinks!"

JAMBUKU: I didn't read the whole series (yet), but my daughter is reading it...it took her months to convince me to let her read it and I eventually let her. The kid gets straight A's, helps around the house, volunteers at the library...I couldn't say no. Plus, I read WIFEY when I was 12, and I turned out sorta OK.

Post a Comment